In 2006, the AIDS incident was a quarter-century old. The disease was first discovered in homosexual men from Manhattan . The epidemic did not begin in Africa . The first AIDS case was uncovered in Manhattan in 1979. The AIDS epidemic in Africa did not start until the autumn of 1982 at the earliest. Before discovering the man-made theory of AIDS, it is worth watching a small but extremely vocal team who considers the cause of AIDS is still unidentified, the AIDS blood test is worthless, and that HIV is a harmless virus that is not sexually transmitted.
Formally starting in July 1981 as a strange and critical illness specifically discovered in several number of younger white gay men from New York City and Los Angeles . The disease has already killed 20 million people with 40 million more currently contaminated with the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), commonly approved as the only cause of AIDS. One million Americans are now contaminated with HIV; and almost 50 percent of the new cases are African-American.
The disease was first discovered in homosexual men from In April 1984, Robert Gallo of the US National Cancer Institution (NCI) announced his finding of HIV as the cause of AIDS. Thus, Luc Montagnier of the Pasteur Institute in
Twenty-five years later, the origin of AIDS continues to be a mystery. The disease is commonly considered to have started in
However, it is worth watching that this view is theory, not confirmed reality.
Montagnier has smartly told that it is essential to distinguish between the ancestral origin of HIV and the beginning of the AIDS epidemic. The animal virus ancestor of HIV may indeed be century old, but it is obvious the epidemic itself is new.
The epidemic did not begin in
How was HIV introduced only into the gay community in the late 1970s? The unique release of HIV into the homosexual of
Combining AIDS information and myths has long been obvious to researchers like me who are assured that HIV did not come from Mother Nature and “species jumps.” However, was most likely introduced by means of contaminated vaccine experiments specifically targeting on the Black African and the American Gay community.
Before discovering the man-made theory of AIDS, it is worth watching a small but extremely vocal team who considers the cause of AIDS is still unidentified, the AIDS blood test is worthless, and that HIV is a harmless virus that is not sexually transmitted. This team, headed by retrovirologist Peter Duesberg and other well-credentialed scientific “dissidents,” considers AIDS is a toxic and nutritional syndrome. They blame AIDS on recreational medication use among gays – and poverty and malnutrition in
As a medical doctor and AIDS and cancer researcher, I am certainly not in conform with this team, but they have been successful politically, influencing world leaders like President Thabo Mbeki of South Africa, much to the chagrin of the World Health Organization.
Genetic Engineering and the AIDS Epidemic
There is a close connection between the rise of genetic engineering and mixing of viruses in the early 1970s and the outbreak of HIV in late 1970s. This connection continues with the many unmatched “emerging diseases” cause by “new viruses” that continue up to the present time.
In 1970, the discovery of a cell enzyme, known as “reverse transcriptase” by Howard Temin and David Baltimore, allowed molecular biologist to detect the so-called retroviruses in some animal cancers. It was soon recognized that retroviruses could be found normally in the genes of many animal cells, and that scientists could, controlled these viruses to produce damaging effects on the immune system. In “species jumping” laboratory experiment, many viruses were transferred between different animal species and were adapted to human cells.
As part of President Richard Nixon’s “War on Cancer,” genetic engineering of viruses became a fundamental element of the now mostly neglected Special Virus Cancer Program, performed under the protection of the NCI. Nixon also transferred part of the Army’s biological warfare unit at
All this virus transfer and molecular manipulation was a biological disaster patiently waiting to occur. What would occur if one of these risky genetic creations escaped from the laboratory into the public sector? This resulted in a historic meeting entitled “Biohazards in Biological Research” held at Asilomar, near
By the late-1970s, the War against Cancer and the Virus Cancer Program shown a break with no cancer-causing retroviruses discovered in humans. The Program was winding down in 1978, at the exact time when government scientists were also enrolling most gay men in
Five years later, Gallo, who had proved helpful for the Virus Cancer Program (VCP), “discovered” the retrovirus that causes AIDS; and Duesberg, who also worked for the VCP, is constantly announcing that HIV is safe.
Is there a connection between the laboratory manipulation of primate retroviruses in the nineteen seventies and the outbreak of AIDS? Alternatively, did Mother Nature ideally pick that exact time to jump monkey genes into gay men to revive the science of retro virology and the careers of virologists like Gallo?
The Gay Vaccine Experiment and the Outbreak of AIDS
The first AIDS cases in
The New York Blood Center (NYBC) is the largest independent blood supplier and distributor in the
In 1970, Alfred M Prince, M.D., head of the NYBC Laboratory of Virology, started his hepatitis research with chimps found at LEMSIP (Laboratory for Experimental Medicine and Surgery) in downstate Tuxedo, NY. Until disbanded in 1997, LEMSIP supplied
Founded in 1965, LEMSIP was associated with
In 1974 Prince, with the support of Aaron Kellner, President of the NYBC, moved the chimp hepatitis research to a new primate center known as Vilab II in
The hepatitis B research, which inoculated over 1,000 healthy gay men, was a huge success with 96% of the men developing antibodies again the hepatitis virus. This high rate of success could not have been obtained if the men were immunosuppressed, because immunosuppressed individuals do not easily form antibodies to the vaccine. The experiment was followed by similar hepatitis B experiments using gay men in
In the mid-1980s, the many blood specimens granted by the gay
The final fate of all the men in the experiment has never been exposed. However, the blood donated by these men is the oldest HIV-positive blood test on record in the
There is also a covered up connection between the outbreak of AIDS in Africa and the extensive vaccine programs performed by the World Health Organization (WHO) in the nineteen seventies in
This intense story connecting AIDS to African vaccines was covered up and never showed up in the managed major
Vaccines, Species Jumping and HIV
There are natural risks in vaccine production because vaccines are created on living cells. Contamination with bacteria and viruses are continuous issues during manufacturing. Laboratory additives used to feed the cell cultures (such as fetal bovine [cow] serum) may also be a source of microbial contamination. Some researchers believe living and killed viruses injected into one's human body can merge with other viruses normally present in the body, leading to disease-causing “recombinants.” Vaccines can also contain viral particles, as well as newly accepted tiny bacteria known as “nanobacteria.” Half the 2004 flu vaccine supply was damaged because of contamination with disease-causing bacteria. The risks of vaccines are downplayed in a try to guarantee the community that vaccines are safe.
We are continuously told that HIV is the first primate virus to “jump species” and produce an epidemic in humans. However, the fact is, the AIDS epidemic is the second instance in which a monkey virus has been transferred to humans by means of vaccines.
Rarely publicized is the fact that a cancer-causing monkey virus jump species a half century ago when contaminated polio vaccines were injected into millions of people, including 50 percent of the
Despite the lack of government attention, independent researchers over the past decades show the virus (SV40) is clearly associated with rapidly fatal cancers of the lung (mesothelioma), bone marrow cancer (multiple myeloma), mind tumours in kids, and other forms of cancer.
A Washington Times review (September 21, 2003) states, “Some of the polio vaccine given to an incredible number of American children from 1962 until 2000 could have been contaminated with a monkey virus,” base on the records and statement sent to a House committee Wednesday. The vaccine manufacturer said such claims “don’t have any legality and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) agrees.” (See the website: www.sv40cancer.com.)
Medical Experimentation and Biological Warfare
The idea of man-made AIDS is often considered a paranoid belief. Why would scientists present a virus to kill an incredible number of people? AIDS experts regularly blame primates and human sexuality for the origin and spread of HIV, but they never consider the possibility that HIV could have originated in an animal cancer virus laboratory.
The sad fact is that government authorities and the military do indeed experiment on unsuspecting citizens. In addition, Iraqi bioweapons of mass devastation was one reason used to rationalize the current invasion of
Clearly, AIDS started as a “gay disease.” However, yet another downplayed reality is the HIV “strain” in
Harvard virologist Max Essex claims the American HIV spread more easily by means of anal sex; whereas the African strains spread more effectively by means of vaginal sex. This could describe why the American epidemic spreads mainly through homosexual activity and anal sex, while in
The Relationship between AIDS and Cancer
The relationship between AIDS and cancer is also downplayed, with the connection between the Special Virus Cancer Program and the following outbreak of HIV. In Gallo’s book, he readily admits to a relationship between AIDS and cancer, noting, “Many people with AIDS develop one or more cancers.”
There is now no doubt that HIV can lead to an increased event of cancer, particularly Kaposi’s sarcoma, Hodgkin’s disease, nonHodgkin’s lymphoma, and cervical cancer.
The purpose of the Virus Cancer Program was twofold. First, to discover a virus in humans that could cause a form of cancer. Second, to develop immunosuppressive laboratory viruses useful in “making” cancer in experimental animals.
When Gallo discovered HIV back in 1984, he called as it a cancer-causing “leukemia or lymphoma” virus.
The name was easily changed to a “lymphotropic” virus, thus obscuring the relationship between the new “gay disease” and cancer. Virologists were quickly convinced the virus came from primates, and both Gallo and Essex heavily marketed the readily accepted African green monkey origin of HIV. A several years later, chimpanzees (rather than monkeys) became the more preferred source. The primate origin of HIV was further hidden by titling the virus as a “human immunodeficiency virus” (HIV), rather than calling it “primate immunodeficiency virus” (or PIV) in humans.
Is HIV the Sole Cause of AIDS?
As mentioned, HIV is believed to be the only cause of AIDS, although a few AIDS dissidents believe HIV is safe. Overlooked by both groups is the matter of the source of Kaposi’s sarcoma, the “gay cancer” associated with AIDS.
In 1994, it was reported that KS is cause by a new “herpes-8” virus. KS cases were first discovered in the late 19th century; and before AIDS, it was a rare form of cancer. Before AIDS, KS was a no transmissible disease that was never seen in young American men.
The finding of a new KS virus shows that two different virus were at the same time introduced into gay men when AIDS began in 4 decades ago. No logical description has been put forth for this unusual affair; and how this “new” virus could cause a gay epidemic of KS has never been explained satisfactorily.
Further complicating the “sole cause” of AIDS situation is the recent finding of small microbial types known as “mycoplasma.” Luc Montagnier considers these microbes are essential contagious “cofactors” in developing AIDS, although most AIDS researchers neglect mycoplasma.
The “Cancer Microbe” Links to AIDS
Although the accurate cause of cancer is unidentified, there is a century of microbial research linking certain tuberculosis-like bacteria to cancer. This research is ignored as medical heresy, but my own exposed cancer research show that “acid-fast” bacteria indeed are available in common forms of cancer and in Kaposi’s sarcoma.
I have written substantially about these bacteria in AIDS: The Mystery and the Solution (1984), The Cancer Microbe (1990), and Four Women Against Cancer (2005). Cancer bacteria have characteristics of both bacteria and viruses. There are also similarities to mycoplasma and to newly discovered nanobacteria, currently regarded to be the tiniest forms of life and known to contaminate commercial vaccines. Nanobacteria are popular and may be engaged in the pathology of many diseases currently regarded of unidentified cause.
Cancer microbe research has been ignored in AIDS and KS. However, Lawrence Broxmeyer, M.D., in AIDS: What the Discoverers of HIV Never Admitted (2003), concludes the real cause of AIDS is not HIV, but actually tuberculosis-like bacteria. He believes Gallo and Montagnier discovered a retrovirus because that was the only thing they were looking for.
Unlike Broxmeyer, I believe HIV came out of animal cancer research and dangerous vaccine and biological warfare experimentation – and that HIV made its way into vaccines injected into African Blacks and American Gays. If unrecognized cancer microbes were confirmed to be an unrecognized contagious cause in cancer and AIDS, as I believe they are, this would certainly add to the dangers of genetic engineering of cancer viruses and new biowarfare agents.
I believe HIV is essential to produce the immunodeficiency characteristic of AIDS, but I consider HIV plus unrecognized “cancer bacteria” to be the causes of AIDS.
The Origin of Gallo’s HIV Virus
Could HIV be related to reported virus-like forms of cancer bacteria? A careful reading of how Gallo “isolated” HIV shows possible derivation from cancerous tissues harboring unrecognized bacteria.
Unlike most bacteria, which can be grown on artificial laboratory culture media, viruses need living tissues to grow and survive. Pulitzer Prizewinning writer David Crewdson provides a specific analysis of the finding of HIV in Science Fictions: A Scientific Mystery, A Massive Cover-Up, and the Dark legacy of Robert Gallo (2002), an unattractive image of Gallo and an account of the court action started by the Pasteur Institution, blaming Gallo of taking the AIDS virus.
According to Crewdson, HIV was finally isolated in Gallo’s lab by isolating the virus in pooled blood T-cells from ten patients with AIDS. From that brew, the virus was cultured in larger amounts for commercial purposes by growing HIV on “cell lines” based on the white blood cells (T-cells) of patients with lymphoma cancer. This particular strain of HIV became the basis for Gallo’s patented HIV blood test and the causing lawsuit.
Montagnier stated that he first discovered HIV at Pasteur and when he sent the virus to Gallo’s lab for testing, he considers Gallo stole the virus and made it his own discovery. Gallo continuously announced his virus was not the French virus.
It was gradually confirmed that Montagnier’s virus somehow made its way into Gallo’s HIV culture. Just as everyone's fingerprints are different, so too is every HIV virus. Gallo’s virus was molecularly similar to Montagnier’s in every respect. With the intervention of President Ronald Reagan and the French Premier, the lawsuit was resolved out of court in 1987, with the two researchers accepting to split the royalties from the AIDS blood test.
Despite all this, the scientific controversy continued, leading to extra research by the National Academy of Sciences and the NIH Office of Scientific Integrity. In 1991, Gallo finally conceded that Montagnier’s virus had most likely contaminated his laboratory and that his AIDS patented blood test was indeed based on the Pasteur virus. In 1992, the National Academy of Sciences’ board finished its research, generating a review critical of Gallo.
All these scientific problems around the precise lab source of HIV point to serious issues in virology. For example, for several years, Gallo could not or reluctant to confess his virus was similar to Montagnier’s virus, even though they proved as similar as any two HIV virus strains could be. Besides, the controversy shows how easily “outside” viruses can contaminate virus labs.
One of the disputes of the man-made theory of AIDS is the experimental hepatitis B vaccine was contaminated with an immunosuppressive AIDS-causing agent and the Kaposi’s sarcoma virus. This theory is criticized as conspiracy theory. The vaccine was unlike any other in that it was made from the blood of gay men who were hepatitis B virus carriers. During the gay experiment at the NYBC, there was concern that something was wrong with the vaccine and that it might be contaminated. According to July Goodfield’s Quest for the Killers, p. 86, “This was no theoretical worry, contamination having been suspected in one batch made by the National Institutes of Health, though never in Merck’s.”
Four years before AIDS in 1975, Gallo also reported a “human virus” (HL-23) that later turned out to be three damaging lab cancer-causing primate viruses (gibbon ape virus, simian sarcoma virus, and baboon endogenous virus). Gallo claims he has no idea how these animal virus contaminated his lab. In 1986,
Despite these contaminations, Gallo and Essex both blamed AIDS on monkey in the forest and intensely promoted the “out of
After AIDS started there were instances where a strain of HIV isolated from a particular AIDS patients unintentionally contaminated HIV specimens from other AIDS patients – and where HIV strains sent to other laboratories unintentionally contaminated more specimens.
For years, Montagnier was adament that Gallo’s virus was isolated from a French patient known as Brugiere. In 1991, the two major AIDS experts were amazed to learn that Gallo’s strain of HIV belonged to a patient named Laillier. Unknowingly to Montagnier, the “Bru” culture had somehow contaminated the “Lai” culture at the Pasteur lab.
Is AIDS Genocide Against Gays and Blacks?
Why is there a blackout of the man-made theory of AIDS in the scientific literature and in the corporate-controlled media? Although some evidence is presented here, it is a fraction of the documentation presented in my two books on the man-made epidemic, and in books by Dr. Leonard Horowitz, and Professor Robert E Lee, and in Dr. Robert Strecker’s video “The Strecker Memorandum”, and in other sources.
I do not believe the exclusive introduction of HIV into the most hated minority in
Why were African Blacks targeted? Many Africans and African-Americans believe AIDS is an experiment to rid Black people, as part of a government-sanctioned world depopulation program.
American gays were the perfect target to test a new retrovirus. A mostly homophobic community would easily accept HIV disease in gays, because of their supposed promiscuity and medication use. Few people would believe the US government would secretly test biologics agents on its civilians, although there is a well-documented record of secret illegal experimentation extending back to the Cold War of the 1950s which includes the government’s terrible “radiation experiments.”
I cannot describe the silence and apathy on these issues from the Black and the Gay communities. People do not care much about genocide unless their own group is affected; and even so, most people are in denial and do not want to know about man-made AIDS. Many AIDS activists simply neglect the man-made theory as a “distraction” which interferes HIV testing and treatment, and the search for a cure.
The Secret Reputation of AIDS
The history of AIDS has been purposely whitewashed to obscure its man-made origin. Knowledge of HIV and other retroviruses came directly out of the little-known and secret Special Virus Cancer Program of the 1970s. More than one virus was introduced into
Secret biowarfare research comingled with true cancer research at the NCI in the several years before AIDS, and that association carries on up to the existing time. AIDS in
Mother Nature smartly separated the species but, in the several years before AIDS, genetic researchers continuously breached the “species barrier” by transferring cancer-causing viruses between various animal species, to improve our health.
The man-made theory of AIDS is not based on conspiracy theory. The theory should get a scientific investigation – and the secret record of HIV and AIDS needs to come out of the closet.
(Source: Alan Cantwell, MD study)
(Source: Alan Cantwell, MD study)
ALAN
CANTWELL MD is
a retired physician and cancer researcher who believes cancer is caused by
bacteria and AIDS is man-made. There is probably no other physician on the
planet whose publications are as controversial. Dr. Cantwell is a frequent
contributor to New Dawn. Much of his research can be found on google.com, and
thirty of his published papers can be accessed at www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PubMed/ (type in Cantwell AR Hollywood ,
California
0 comments:
Post a Comment