We were all assumed to be dead by now, deep-fried to a toasty potato like chip. Alternatively, doomed to die with the polar bears. It was to be a soggy finish for the first lovely planet within the cosmos and for all the passengers riding on it. The world alarmists never got their story of fright and worry straight, whether by now we might be fried or frozen.
First, they warned of global warming, and once they needed a
replacement story “global warming” became “climate change.” They finally
settled on one thing they might prove because the climate does, in fact,
change. First, it rains, and then the sun comes out. Then it rains once more.
Rain, sun, rain, sun, drip, drip, and dry. The story is ever new.
![]() |
Global Warming Scam |
Only thirteen years past (and thirteen is the unluckiest of the numbers, which is scary, too), a scientist at the climate-research unit of
That was then, and this can be now, and
The global-warming hysteria grew quickly scarcity early prediction of an insufficiency of snow. Certain scientists with much ambition than sense saw chance lying close. With the falling snow might come back falling grants to pay for learned papers. Learned academics have learned that a feverish alarm, served with a small indefinite amount of hysteria, can move the learned nonsense out of the faculty lounge, into the newspapers, and onto television screens. In addition, not simply in old Blighty, where the fraud originated.
James Hansen, whose career at National Aeronautics and Space Administration gave him the credentials to be taken seriously even when he did not sound serious, predicted that within the decade after 2020 the average annual temperature would rise by 9 degrees, with more heat to come. Before long, we might be boiling like lobsters. An ambitious young man with his sights on medicine or the law would possibly set his sights higher, and consider a career in fans and air-conditioning.
Mr. Hansen, in an op-ed essay in the Washington Post, blames everything on “climate change” – the European heat wave of 2003, the Russian heat wave of 2010, disastrous droughts in
The admiration Mr. Hansen and his like-minded colleagues
have for they are as breathtaking as their contempt for all who disagree with
them. The more their fraud crumbles, the louder they shout its facts. Mr.
Hansen says he started speaking out about climate change again, after relative
reticence, because he did not want his grandchildren to say, “Pa, you
understood what was happening, but you never made it clear.” Now that events
are making it clear what a fraud global warming is, those grandchildren are
more possible to say, “Pa, why did you tell all those fibs and stretchers for
so long?”
0 comments:
Post a Comment